Re: [PATCH 05/50] Dynamic debug: Add more flags

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:56:08PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:10:43PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Add flags that allow the user to specify via debugfs whether or not the
> > module name, function name, line number and/or thread ID have to be
> > included in the printed message.
> 
> This piece is going to conflict with the jump label update patches, I'm
> trying to get into .39. The 'if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled))' bit is
> now: 'if (DDEBUG_BRANCH(descriptor.enabled))'. So its a small conflict,
> but they wouldn't merge together. So we need to adjust either one (and
> make sure they're applied in the correct orer), or drop one.

This has been in linux-next for months now, where were the jump label
patches tested that missed this?  Why wasn't your patches in linux-next
before the merge window opened?  That's a requirement for .39 stuff,
right?

Also, this is already in Linus's tree so you will have to handle the
merge issue on your side now.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/