[PATCH 07/15] GFS2: quota allows exceeding hard limit

From: Steven Whitehouse
Date: Tue Mar 15 2011 - 05:34:19 EST


From: Abhijith Das <adas@xxxxxxxxxx>

Immediately after being synced to disk, cached quotas are zeroed out and a
subsequent access of the cached quotas results in incorrect zero values. This
meant that gfs2 assumed the actual usage to be the zero (or near-zero) usage
values it found in the cached quotas and comparison against warn/limits never
triggered a quota violation.

This patch adds a new flag QDF_REFRESH that is set after a sync so that the
cached quotas are forcefully refreshed from disk on a subsequent access on
seeing this flag set.

Resolves: rhbz#675944
Signed-off-by: Abhi Das <adas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/incore.h b/fs/gfs2/incore.h
index 720c1e6..59aaaa0 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/incore.h
+++ b/fs/gfs2/incore.h
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ enum {
QDF_USER = 0,
QDF_CHANGE = 1,
QDF_LOCKED = 2,
+ QDF_REFRESH = 3,
};

struct gfs2_quota_data {
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/quota.c b/fs/gfs2/quota.c
index 6ec964c..e23d986 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/quota.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/quota.c
@@ -834,6 +834,7 @@ static int do_sync(unsigned int num_qd, struct gfs2_quota_data **qda)
goto out_end_trans;

do_qc(qd, -qd->qd_change_sync);
+ set_bit(QDF_REFRESH, &qd->qd_flags);
}

error = 0;
@@ -929,6 +930,7 @@ int gfs2_quota_lock(struct gfs2_inode *ip, u32 uid, u32 gid)
{
struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = GFS2_SB(&ip->i_inode);
struct gfs2_alloc *al = ip->i_alloc;
+ struct gfs2_quota_data *qd;
unsigned int x;
int error = 0;

@@ -942,7 +944,11 @@ int gfs2_quota_lock(struct gfs2_inode *ip, u32 uid, u32 gid)
sort_qd, NULL);

for (x = 0; x < al->al_qd_num; x++) {
- error = do_glock(al->al_qd[x], NO_FORCE, &al->al_qd_ghs[x]);
+ int force = NO_FORCE;
+ qd = al->al_qd[x];
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(QDF_REFRESH, &qd->qd_flags))
+ force = FORCE;
+ error = do_glock(qd, force, &al->al_qd_ghs[x]);
if (error)
break;
}
--
1.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/