Re: [PATCH v2 2.6.38-rc8-tip 0/20] 0: Inode based uprobes

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > IOW, I'm trying to get an understanding of how you expect this feature
> > will actually become useful to end users - the kernel patch is only
> > part of the story.
> 
> One user would be systemtap for user tracing as I understand. Systemtap has a 
> userbase (at least I use it, although not for user tracing)

That's a brilliant reason to drop it right away. systemtap is the
least of our worries.
 
> Right now lots of distros apply ugly patchkits to handle this instead,
> which is not good (tm).

s/lots of distros/some enterprise distros where the management still
believes that this is a valuable feature add/

You deliberately skipped the first part of akpms question:

> How do you envisage these features actually get used?  For example,
> will gdb be modified?  Will other debuggers be modified or written?

How about answering this question first _BEFORE_ advertising
systemtap?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/