Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: remove null checks before kfree

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Feb 24 2011 - 12:25:55 EST


On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 09:06 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:08:29AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 03:53:40AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > > This patch was created with the following semantic patch:
> > >
> > > // <smpl>
> > > @@
> > > expression E;
> > > @@
> > >
> > > - if (E != NULL) kfree(E);
> > > + kfree(E);
> > > // </smpl>
> >
> > OK, so when will we be removing the unlikely() from the implementations
> > of kfree()?
> >
> > if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(block)))
> > return;
>
> Have you run the tool that checks for unlikely being true here? Odds
> are, even with all of these changes, the large majority of the time
> kfree is called, it has a valid pointer.

Crap, all my saved output files were in the /tmp directory and has since
been purged. I can reboot into the unlikely tracing kernel again, but
that may have to wait. I usually just do that at end of year as a
cleanup.

I can't remember exactly where kfree came in, but IIRC it was on the
list. Maybe not that high though.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/