Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_PM altogether, enable power managementall the time

[Frank Rowand]

On 02/09/11 10:40, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:31:29AM -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:
> 
>> Raphael's patch will turn on CONFIG_PM in the correct circumstances, and
>> leave it off when not needed by other config options.  That means that
>> the size overhead will _not_ be an issue for me because CONFIG_PM
>> will not be enabled when not needed.
> 
> That's not the issue you seemed to be raising, though.  While PM is now
> turned on by PM_SLEEP that'll end up getting turned on by default due to
> the dependency on SUSPEND - you appeared to be raising the concern that
> this could happen and surprise users.

No, that is not my concern.  I was saying that Raphael's patches do
not trigger any concern from me.

My concern was that in your very first email that started this thread,
you wrote:

On 02/07/11 04:22, Mark Brown wrote:
> It is very rare to find a current system which is both sufficiently
> resource constrained to want to compile out power management support
> and sufficiently power insensitive to be able to tolerate doing so.
> Since having the configuration option requires non-zero effort to
> maintain, with ifdefery in most drivers, but it is used with vanishing
> rarity it is simpler to just remove the option.

and my understanding of this proposal was a goal to remove the ability
to have CONFIG_PM disabled, which results in increased memory usage
for some configurations.

-Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/