Re: lockdep: possible reason: unannotated irqs-off. (was: Re:Linux 2.6.38-rc4)

From: Yong Zhang
Date: Tue Feb 08 2011 - 08:35:15 EST


On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:11:08PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] softirq: introduce loacal_bh_enable_force_wake()
>
> If there is pending softirq, don't handle it in the caller's
> context, invoke ksoftirqd directly instead.
>
> del_timer_sync() will be the first caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/bottom_half.h | 1 +
> kernel/softirq.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bottom_half.h b/include/linux/bottom_half.h
> index 27b1bcf..665d697 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bottom_half.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bottom_half.h
> @@ -5,5 +5,6 @@ extern void local_bh_disable(void);
> extern void _local_bh_enable(void);
> extern void local_bh_enable(void);
> extern void local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip);
> +extern void local_bh_enable_force_wake(void);
>
> #endif /* _LINUX_BH_H */
> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> index 68eb5ef..3c05dfa 100644
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -154,9 +154,9 @@ void _local_bh_enable(void)
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(_local_bh_enable);
>
> -static inline void _local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip)
> +static inline void _local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, bool force_wake)
> {
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq() || irqs_disabled());
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq() || (!force_wake && irqs_disabled()));

Only suppressing the warning is not enough here :(

> #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
> local_irq_disable();


The semantic "called with irqs_disabled" is showed on several place
of _local_bh_enable_ip().

Need more thinking about it...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/