Re: [patch 07/10] m68knommu: Convert 5272 intc irq_chip to new functions

From: Greg Ungerer
Date: Mon Feb 07 2011 - 22:25:36 EST



Hi Thomas,

On 07/02/11 09:39, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/m68knommu/platform/5272/intc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: linux-next/arch/m68knommu/platform/5272/intc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-next.orig/arch/m68knommu/platform/5272/intc.c
+++ linux-next/arch/m68knommu/platform/5272/intc.c
@@ -78,8 +78,10 @@ static struct irqmap intc_irqmap[MCFINT_
* an interrupt on this irq (for the external irqs). So this mask function
* is also an ack_mask function.
*/
-static void intc_irq_mask(unsigned int irq)
+static void intc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
{
+ unsigned int irq = d->irq;
+
if ((irq >= MCFINT_VECBASE) && (irq <= MCFINT_VECMAX)) {
u32 v;
irq -= MCFINT_VECBASE;
@@ -88,8 +90,10 @@ static void intc_irq_mask(unsigned int i
}
}

-static void intc_irq_unmask(unsigned int irq)
+static void intc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
{
+ unsigned int irq = d->irq;
+
if ((irq >= MCFINT_VECBASE) && (irq <= MCFINT_VECMAX)) {
u32 v;
irq -= MCFINT_VECBASE;
@@ -98,8 +102,10 @@ static void intc_irq_unmask(unsigned int
}
}

-static void intc_irq_ack(unsigned int irq)
+static void intc_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
{
+ unsigned int irq = d->irq;
+
/* Only external interrupts are acked */
if ((irq >= MCFINT_VECBASE) && (irq <= MCFINT_VECMAX)) {
irq -= MCFINT_VECBASE;
@@ -113,8 +119,10 @@ static void intc_irq_ack(unsigned int ir
}
}

-static int intc_irq_set_type(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type)
+static int intc_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
{
+ unsigned int irq = d->irq;
+
if ((irq >= MCFINT_VECBASE) && (irq <= MCFINT_VECMAX)) {
irq -= MCFINT_VECBASE;
if (intc_irqmap[irq].ack) {
@@ -137,17 +145,17 @@ static int intc_irq_set_type(unsigned in
*/
static void intc_external_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
{
- desc->chip->ack(irq);
+ get_irq_desc_chip(i)->irq_ack(desc->irq_data);
^^^ ^^^
should this be:

get_irq_desc_chip(desc)->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data)

I can't runtime test this right at the moment, but otherwise:

Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Regards
Greg



handle_simple_irq(irq, desc);
}

static struct irq_chip intc_irq_chip = {
.name = "CF-INTC",
- .mask = intc_irq_mask,
- .unmask = intc_irq_unmask,
- .mask_ack = intc_irq_mask,
- .ack = intc_irq_ack,
- .set_type = intc_irq_set_type,
+ .irq_mask = intc_irq_mask,
+ .irq_unmask = intc_irq_unmask,
+ .irq_mask_ack = intc_irq_mask,
+ .irq_ack = intc_irq_ack,
+ .irq_set_type = intc_irq_set_type,
};

void __init init_IRQ(void)

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/