Re: [PATCH 0/9] perf/core improvements and fixes

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Feb 07 2011 - 10:07:35 EST



* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
>
> Please consider pulling from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux-2.6 perf/core
>
> Regards,
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> Borislav Petkov (1):
> perf annotate: Fix build error
>
> Denis Kirjanov (1):
> perf top: Use pid_t for target_{pid|tid}
>
> Franck Bui-Huu (1):
> perf probe: Rewrite find_lazy_match_lines() by using getline(3)
>
> Kyle McMartin (1):
> perf tool: Fix gcc 4.6.0 issues
>
> Masami Hiramatsu (4):
> tracing/kprobes: Cleanup strict_strtol() using code
> tracing/kprobes: Support longer (>128 bytes) command
> tracing/kprobes: Add bitfield type
> perf probe: Add bitfield member support
>
> Michael Witten (1):
> perf tools: Makefile: Use $(QUIET_GEN) for perf.so

hm, the perf probe bits do not build on 32-bit:

util/probe-finder.c: In function âconvert_variable_typeâ:
util/probe-finder.c:881: error: format â%luâ expects type âlong unsigned intâ, but argument 6 has type âunsigned intâ
util/probe-finder.c:881: error: format â%luâ expects type âlong unsigned intâ, but argument 6 has type âunsigned intâ
make: *** [util/probe-finder.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/