Re: 2.6.37 considered stable?

[Gene Heskett]

On Friday, February 04, 2011, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 04:51 -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>> 
>>  just curious and no criticism intended :-) Is 2.6.37 so stable, that
>>  it doesn't
>> 
>> need fixes? I mean, it is almost a month out in the wild and no stable
>> release.
>
>We're lulling bugs into a false sense of security.  We'll slaughter them
>by the hundreds in their sleep :)
>
>	-Mike

Chuckle.  I've been running 2.6.37 here, with all of that new group 
scheduling stuff enabled, the desktop feels great and my only fuss is that 
kaffiene, when watching digital tv on my pcHD-3000 card, is NOT getting 
enough time so both the audio and the video have little 20 millisecond 
holes chopped in them at sub-second intervals.  Not the most pleasant thing 
to watch.  I would appreciate any suggestions on how to get such an  
application a higher priority.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
<http://tinyurl.com/ddg5bz>
Call on God, but row away from the rocks.
		-- Indian proverb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/