Re: Early crash (was: Re: module: show version information forbuilt-in modules in sysfs)

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:52:04PM -0800, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > But why is it aligned on 2-byte boundary and why m64k is not happy with
> > module_version_attribute but is happy with kernel_param which is also
> > aligned similarly?
> 
> struct kernel_parm doesn't contain internal padding on 32 bit
> architectures (it does on 64bit architectures though).
> 
> > If we unroll module_version_attribute it woud look like this:
> >
> > struct module_version_attribute {
> >
> > 	struct module_attribute {
> >
> > 		struct attribute {
> > 			const char *name;
> > 			mode_t mode;
> > 		} attr;
> > 		...
> >
> > 	} mattr;
> >
> > 	const char *module_name;
> > 	const char *version;
> > };
> >
> > So I would expect it be aligned on (char *) boundary which should be the
> > same as (void *).
> 
> mode_t is a 16 bit type, thus any following member becomes aligned on an
> odd 2 byte boundary.

Even pointers? I'd expect pointers to be aligned on 4-bytes boundaries?

Thanks,

Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/