Re: NILFS crash on 2.6.37

From: Ryusuke Konishi
Date: Sat Jan 22 2011 - 09:10:47 EST


On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:57:48 -0500, Wakko Warner wrote:
> Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:37:38 +0900 (JST), Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > > (Cc'ed to linux-nilfs)
> > Does the following patch fix your problem?
>
> > diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/super.c b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> > index 0994f6a7..58fd707 100644
> > --- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c
> > @@ -704,7 +704,8 @@ skip_mount_setup:
> > sbp[0]->s_state =
> > cpu_to_le16(le16_to_cpu(sbp[0]->s_state) & ~NILFS_VALID_FS);
> > /* synchronize sbp[1] with sbp[0] */
> > - memcpy(sbp[1], sbp[0], nilfs->ns_sbsize);
> > + if (sbp[1])
> > + memcpy(sbp[1], sbp[0], nilfs->ns_sbsize);
> > return nilfs_commit_super(sbi, NILFS_SB_COMMIT_ALL);
> > }
>
> That patch fix it. Just a note, the 2.6.37 vanilla source was about 20
> lines up from 704

Thanks for testing. Will send upstream and to stable.


> > > > [ 1202.581501] NILFS warning: broken superblock. using spare superblock.
> > > > [ 1202.582093] NILFS warning: broken superblock. using spare superblock.
>
> Why does it say this 2 times? Just curious.

Because each super block is read twice in different block sizes.

Well, indeed it looks confusing. I'll try to do something.


Ryusuke Konishi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/