Re: [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 1/4] Generic support forthis_cpu_cmpxchg_double

[Tejun Heo]

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 08:30:41AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> There is a technical argument: any noninline version will have
> actual code overhead.

But the type checking and all those stuff have to be macros anyway.
If out-of-line implementation is necessary, it can take whatever
parameter to optimize performance from the frontend macro.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/