Re: [2.6.38-rc1] btrfs potential false-positive lockdep report...

[Josef Bacik]

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:53:51AM +0700, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> I saw a lockdep report with an instrumented 2.6.38-rc1 kernel [1].
> 
> Checking the code, it looks more likely a false-positive due to the
> lock manipulation to satisfy lockdep, since CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is
> defined.
> 
> Is this the case?
> 

Yeah these pop up every once and a while, its safe to just ignore it.  Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/