Re: [PATCH -v10 0/4] Lock-less list

[Ingo Molnar]

* huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > But will all that stuff be accepted? Please stop sending infrastructure bits and 
> > focus on your larger RAS picture, once you have consensus on that from all 
> > parties involved, then, and only then, does it make sense to submit everything, 
> > including infrastructure.
> 
> I am not sending hardware error reporting infrastructure.  As far as I know, Linus 
> and Andrew suggest to use printk for hardware error reporting.  And now, I just 
> try to write APEI driver and reporting hardware error with printk.  Is it 
> acceptable?  Do you have some other idea about hardware error reporting?

Erm, how could you possible have missed the perf based RAS daemon work of Boris, 
which we've pointed out about half a dozen times already?

It's somewhat annoying that you simply ignore repeated feedback and feign ignorance. 
Reminds me of someone :-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/