Re: [RFC patch 00/28] Removal of trace event semicolons

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 08:19:16PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > * Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 04:59:27PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I am hereby proposing the removal of trailing semicolons within the trace event
> > > > headers.
> > > > 
> > > > Please refer to "patch 01: TRACE_EVENT: gradual semicolon removal" for
> > > > explanation of this change. This patchset is based on the 2.6.37 kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > Feedback is welcome,
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > Mathieu
> > > 
> > > 
> > > So, it seems there is no issue in spreading the whole into
> > > each relevant trees?
> > 
> > Because there is a dependency on patch 01, I think it would be much less painful
> > to bring in the whole patchset through the tracing tree rather than each
> > targeted tree. Otherwise, we have to ensure that each tree has pulled the commit
> > from the tracing tree before pulling the patches that depend on it.
> 
> Ok.
>  
> > And it only really touches the include/trace/ header files, so it's not as if it
> > touched any specific subsystem code.
> 
> Beware, there are many trace events all over the kernel, not only in
> include/trace

That's right. I grepped for all includes of define_trace.h throughout the whole
kernel to find the others. But they also depend on patch 01.

Thanks,

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/