Re: IRQ enable/disable BUG in IDE w/shared IRQs

[Jeff Garzik]

On 01/14/2011 05:30 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, David Miller wrote:
> > I have a hard time believing we've gotten away with this for so long.
> > Maybe it really is that rare to share the IDE interrupts with other
> > stuff?
>
> IIRC, the legacy IDE interrupts were 14/15 and those were never shared.

Yes, non-shared 14/15 were the 95% common case for the longest time. 
Sharing IDE interrupts within old-IDE worked FSVO "working", but the 
interrupt probes were written for a non-shared interrupt, then hacking 
into working for shared interrupts when PCI first starting showing up on 
the scene.

	Jeff


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/