Re: perf timechart broken

[David Ahern]

On 01/14/11 10:00, Thomas Renninger wrote:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf-
> users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00057.html
> Looks slightly different, the segfault should happen in:
> process_sample_event
> But looks very much related, possibly it has not been made/make with 
> DEBUG=1
> and -O6 was added and the backtrace is not 100% correct?

perf was built with DEBUG=1; that's how I got the pretty backtrace
versus having the arguments optimized out. The cpu=6291457 is the
garbage causing the segfault (there are only 2 cores in the system).
6291457 = 0x600001. Perhaps a mask is missing?

David

> 
> I still did not have time to send it out, will do so on Mo.
> 
>     Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/