Re: [PATCH 4/7] allow killing tasks in your own or child userns

[Serge Hallyn]

Quoting Bastian Blank (bastian@xxxxxxxxxxxx):
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:13:34PM +0000, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > +	const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
> > +	const struct cred *tcred = __task_cred(t);
> > +
> > +	if (cred->user->user_ns != tcred->user->user_ns) {
> > +		/* userids are not equivalent - either you have the
> > +		   capability to the target user ns or you don't */
> > +		if (ns_capable(tcred->user->user_ns, CAP_KILL))
> > +			return 1;
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* same user namespace - usual credentials checks apply */
> > +	if ((cred->euid ^ tcred->suid) &&
> > +	    (cred->euid ^ tcred->uid) &&
> > +	    (cred->uid  ^ tcred->suid) &&
> > +	    (cred->uid  ^ tcred->uid) &&
> > +	    !ns_capable(tcred->user->user_ns, CAP_KILL))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	return 1;
> 
> Isn't that equal to this?
> 
> 	if (ns_capable(tcred->user->user_ns, CAP_KILL))
> 		return 1;
> 
> 	if (cred->user->user_ns == tcred->user->user_ns &&
> 	    (cred->euid == tcred->suid ||
> 	     cred->euid == tcred->uid ||
> 	     cred->uid == tcred->suid ||
> 	     cred->uid == tcred->uid))
> 		return 1;
> 
> 	return 0;
> 
> I would consider this much easier to read.

Unfortunately, it's actually not equivalent.  when capable()
returns success, then it sets the current->flags |= PF_SUPERPRIV.
If permission is granted based on userids and the capability
isn't needed, then we don't want to needlessly set PF_SUPERPRIV.

That's why I'm going to such lengths to call capable() as a last
resort.

I'm definately open to any ideas that'll get the code cleaner.

thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/