Re: 2.6.37 BUG at inode.c:1616 (was Re: 2.6.37: Bug on btrfs whileumount)

[Andy Isaacson]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:08:15AM -0800, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:29:12PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > [50010.838804] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [50010.838931] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:1616!
> > > [50010.839053] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [snip]
> > > [50010.839653] Pid: 1681, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Not tainted 2.6.37 #1
> > 
> > Could you please pull from the master branch of the btrfs unstable tree.
> > We had a late fix that is related to this.
> 
> I saw BUG at inode.c:1616 while running 2.6.37-rc6-11882-g55ec86f, I saw

Just got this again, same BUG and same stack trace.  This machine +
fs ran great for several months under approximately the same workload,
but the FS is slowly filling up; is this a regression in .37 or is the
bug a function of the FS load?

-andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/