Re: [PATCH] Cleanup include/net/tcp.h include-files and coding-style

[Alexey Dobriyan]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Ben Hutchings
<bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 23:33 +0100, Christoph Paasch wrote:

>> > If a file directly references definitions that are supposed to be
>> > provided by a certain header, changing it to rely on indirect inclusion
>> > of that header generally does *not* aid maintenance.
>> But then, to be coherent, we would need to add the following includes (and I'm
>> even not 100% sure if it's all we need):
>>
>> linux/percpu_counter.h (needed for percpu_counter_sum_positive)
>
> Yes.

Currently code compiles fine, so necessary headers are in place,
so simply adding new headers doesn't help anything.

>> linux/mm_types.h (needed for struct page)
>> linux/aio.h (needed for struct kiocb)
>> net/inet_sock.h (needed for struct ip_options)
>> linux/pipe_fs_i.h (needed for struct pipe_inode_info)
>> linux/poll.h (needed for struct poll_table_struct)
>
> Or declarations of those structs.
>
>> linux/compiler.h (needed for __percpu)
> [...]
>
> Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/