Re: [PATCH] UDPCP Communication Protocol

From: Stephen Hemminger
Date: Fri Dec 31 2010 - 12:47:07 EST


On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 10:29:45 +0100
stefani@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> +/*
> + * UDPCP destination descriptor
> + *
> + * For each communication address an individual destination descriptor will
> + * be create.
> + *
> + * The fields has the following meanings:
> + *
> + * list: link list: part of udpcp_sock.destlist
> + * xmit: messages fragments to be transmit
> + * tx_time: timestamp of the last transmitted message fragment
> + * rx_time: timestamp ot the last received message fragment
> + * txTimeout: statistic use only: number of transmit timeout
> + * rxTimeout: statistic use only: number of receive timeout
> + * txRetries: statistic use only: number of transmit retries
> + * rxDiscardedFrags: statistic use only: number of discarded messages
> + * xmit_wait: message fragment which is waiting for an ACK
> + * xmit_last: last fragment transmitted
> + * recv_msg: first fragment of the received message
> + * recv_last: last fragment of the received message
> + * lastmsg: last messages fragment header received
> + * ipc: linux internal ipc cookie
> + * fl: flow/routing information
> + * rt: routing entry currently used for this destination
> + * addr: ipv4 destination address
> + * port: destination port number
> + * msgid: current message id for outgoing data messages
> + * use_flag: statistic use only: flag for dest using TX and/or RX
> + * insync: flag for protocol synchronization
> + * ackmode; ack mode for the current assembled message
> + * chkmode; checksum mode for the current assembled message
> + * try: current number of retries xmit_wait message
> + * acks: number of outstandig ack's
> + */

Why not use docbook format comments for this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/