[PATCH 5/7] perf: Optimise topology iteration

[Lin Ming]

Currently we iterate the full machine looking for a matching core_id/nb
for the percore and the amd northbridge stuff , using a smaller topology
mask makes sense. 

Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c   |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index 67e2202..5a3b7b8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
 	nb_id = amd_get_nb_id(cpu);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(nb_id == BAD_APICID);
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+	for_each_cpu(i, topology_core_cpumask(cpu)) {
 		nb = per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, i).amd_nb;
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!nb))
 			continue;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 354d1de..ad70c2c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
 	if (!ht_enabled(cpu))
 		return;
 
-	for_each_online_cpu(i) {
+	for_each_cpu(i, topology_thread_cpumask(cpu)) {
 		struct intel_percore *pc = per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, i).per_core;
 
 		if (pc && pc->core_id == core_id) {
-- 
1.7.3





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/