Re: [PATCH v2] [ARM] gic: Unmask private interrupts on all coresduring IRQ enable

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 05:46:02PM -0400, Stephen Caudle wrote:
> Some multi-core ARM chips designate a unique IRQ number for each core for
> private peripheral interrupts (PPIs). Others designate a common IRQ number
> for all cores. In the latter case, requesting/freeing private peripheral
> interrupts currently unmasks/masks the interrupt for only the
> executing core, respectively.
> 
> With this change, request_irq will unmask a PPI on all cores so a separate
> call to enable_irq on the other cores is not required. Likewise, free_irq
> will mask a PPI on the other cores. Also, shutdown is implemented instead
> of disable to allow for lazy IRQ disabling.

Sorry, missed this.

If it's a private peripheral, it can only be accessed from its associated
CPU.  What that means is you don't want to enable the interrupt on other
CPUs as the peripheral may not be present or initialized on that CPU.

So I'm nervous about this change - architecturally it feels like the
wrong thing to do to take the PPI interrupts through the generic IRQ
infrastructure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/