Re: [PATCH] PM: Prevent dpm_prepare() from returning errorsunnecessarily

[Alan Stern]

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > Oh, I see.  This is a tricky issue.  Every driver for a device that can
> > have wakeup-enabled children needs to worry about the race between
> > suspending the device and receiving a wakeup request from a child.  
> > For example, in drivers/usb/core/hcd-pci.c, the suspend_common()
> > routine goes out of its way to return -EBUSY if device_may_wakeup() is
> > true and the controller's root hub has a pending wakeup request.
> > 
> > How should drivers handle this in general?  Should we make an effort to
> > convert them to use the wakeup framework so they they can let the PM
> > core take care of these races?
> 
> I think so.
> 
> We also need to put a pm_check_wakeup_events() check into dpm_suspend() IMO,
> so that we abort the suspending of devices as soon as a wakeup event is
> reported.

You might as well add that into this patch.

> > Do we have to consider similar races during runtime suspend?
> 
> Ideally, yes, but I'm not sure if that's generally possible.  IMO, it won't be
> a big deal if a parent device is suspended and immediately resumed occasionally
> due to a pending wakeup signal from one of its children.  It may be a problem
> if that happens too often, though.

Okay.

> Does it mean you're fine with the patch?

Provided you repair the error that Lei Ming pointed out.  That's the 
problem with functions that return Boolean values -- you have to name 
them very carefully.  Ideally the name should be a predicate or a
question.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/