Re: VT console need rewrite

[AmÃrico Wang]

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:10:06AM +0800, Microcai wrote:
>å 2010-11-28æç 20:11 +0100ïSamuel Thibaultåéï
>> Microcai, le Sun 28 Nov 2010 22:29:05 +0800, a Ãcrit :
>> > So, here is the design according to your description  .. 
>> > 
>> > JUST export /dev/fb and /dev/pts and /dev/console
>> > The kernel use /dev/console, but invisible. 
>> > The rest of the world uses /dev/pts
>> > 
>> > Make init using /dev/fb to display boot message, and agetty runs
>> > on /dev/pts
>> 
>> Errr, but that already exists, that's fbterm...
>> 
>> Samuel
>
>Every time someone try to implement something , some other guy will jump
>out and say, that already exist, in user-space ..... blablablabla
>

Remember, remember, kernel provides a mechanism, not a policy.
(From this point, auto-groups *does* break it.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/