Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separatesuper_operation

[Ted Ts'o]

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:36:48AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> There was concern that FITRIM ioctl is not common enough to be included
> in core vfs ioctl, as Christoph Hellwig pointed out there's no real point
> in dispatching this out to a separate vector instead of just through
> ->ioctl.
> 
> So this commit removes ioctl_fstrim() from vfs ioctl and trim_fs
> from super_operation structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>

Trying to redirect this thread back to the original patches....

What do people think?  Should I try to push these two patches to Linus
now, to make it easier for other file systems who might be interested
in implementing FITRIM functionality?

Or should I wait until the 2.6.37-rc1 window?

We're at -rc3, so a change like this is a bit late, but so far no one
else is using trim_fs besides ext4, and it will make life easier for
other file systems, so I'm willing to try pushing this to Linus if
there is consensus from other fs developers.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/