Re: [RFC][PATCH 04/22] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE SMP-related datastructures

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Nov 10 2010 - 14:17:43 EST


On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:29 +0200, Raistlin wrote:
> @@ -1336,6 +1336,7 @@ struct task_struct {
>
> struct list_head tasks;
> struct plist_node pushable_tasks;
> + struct rb_node pushable_dl_tasks;

Shouldn't these be CONFIG_SMP too? Not much use in tracking pushable
tasks when there's nothing to push them to, eh?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/