Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] ARM: imx: Add core definitions for MX53

From: Sascha Hauer
Date: Wed Nov 10 2010 - 12:09:19 EST


On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 03:04:27PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...
>
> >> Agreed, but I was unsure how to proceed with adding clock code for mx53.
> >> Should I merge mx53 clock code into clock-mx51 and rename clock-mx51?
> >
> > Yes, to something like clock-mx51-mx53.c
> >
>
> Or maybe clock-mx5x.c would be more generic.
>
> This way when any other MX5x processor gets added we don't need to
> change the file name again.

This can happen with mx5x also when the next MX5x is incompatible like
we had with i.MX2x when i.MX25 came out. Anyway, in this case I don't
care much.

Sascha


--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/