Re: 2.6.36 io bring the system to its knees

[Linus Torvalds]

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> You will lose data even with data=ordered. All the data that didn't
>> get logged before the crash is lost anyway.
>
> Linus, are you using with data=writeback?

I used to, indeed. But since I upgrade computers fairly regularly, and
all the distros have moved towards ext4, I'm no longer using ext3 at
all.

But yes, to me ext3 was totally unusable with rotational media and
"data=ordered". Not just bad. Total crap. Whenever the mail client
wanted to write something out, the whole machine basically stopped.

Of course, part of that was that long ago I used reiserfs back when
SuSE had it as the default. So I didn't think that the hickups were
"normal" like a lot of people probably do. I knew better. So it was
"bad latency, and I know it's the filesystem that is total crap".

> Those of us, who did (without UPS), will never do it again.

Before or after the change to make renaming on top of old files do the
IO flushing?

That made a big difference for some rather common cases.

                            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/