Re: [PATCH 2/4] udf: Remove unnecessary bkl usages

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:47:09PM +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> The udf_lookup, udf_create, udf_mknod, udf_mkdir, udf_rmdir, udf_link,
> udf_unlink and udf_readdir functions seems already adequately protected
> by i_mutex held by VFS invoking calls. The udf_rename function instead
> should be already protected by lock_rename again by VFS.
> 
> The udf_get_parent, udf_count_free_bitmap, udf_count_free_table and
> udf_put_super functions don't require any protection.

This looks correct to me.  But I'd suggest to reorder it to be the last
patch in the series, after the fine grained locking for the low level
code has been in place.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/