Re: [PATCH] regulator: lock supply in regulator enable

[Liam Girdwood]

On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 12:43 +0100, Mattias Wallin wrote:
> > Sorry, got a busy schedule atm. Can you give us your reasoning behind
> > why you think we need a lock here ?
> Yes, when we enter regulator_enable() we take the lock only for that specific regulator rdev->mutex
> and calls the locked function _regulator_enable().
> This locked function then checks if we have a supply and recursively calls the locked _regulator_enable() again but with the supply rdev as argument.
> The supply rdev regulator is however not locked at this stage, only the "original" supplied regulator is locked.
> So if we have two regulators with the same supply regulator trying to enable at approx. the same time they will both
> enter the _regulator_enable without locks and we could get a race condition.
> This would probably result in reference counting error and unbalanced regulator warnings.
> 
> In our system we make use the regulator hierarchy quite heavily.
> > 

Applied.

Thanks

Liam
-- 
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/