Re: [PATCH]oom-kill: direct hardware access processes should getbonus

From: Figo.zhang
Date: Tue Nov 02 2010 - 10:29:45 EST



>
> Which applications are you referring to that cannot gracefully exit if
> killed?

like Xorg server, if xorg server be killed, the gnome desktop will be
crashed.


>
> CAP_SYS_RAWIO had a much more dramatic impact in the previous heuristic to
> such a point that it would often allow memory hogging tasks to elude the
> oom killer at the expense of innocent tasks. I'm not sure this is the
> best way to go.

is it some experiments for demonstration the CAP_SYS_RAWIO will elude
the oom killer?




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/