Re: [PATCH] SELinux: Do not assign the same value twice to the samevariable

[Jesper Juhl]

On Sat, 30 Oct 2010, Eric Paris wrote:

> On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 23:10 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > It makes little sense to assign the same value to the same variable twice 
> > when there is no code inbetween which could have changed the value of that 
> > variable.
> 
> I don't like the patch.  The compiler will optimize it away (actually it
> will optimize both of them away) and it make it clear that if a new
> block is added in the middle that error codes can't be wrong....
> 
> It's just a personal preference I guess, but I like always setting the
> error code before goto outs.  Is there a reason doing this is a problem?
> 
It's not a problem as such, it just seemed a silly thing to do when I came 
across it. But, I can see your point in leaving it, so just forget about 
the patch.

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>             http://www.chaosbits.net/
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/