Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: Fix buildwarnings

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

On 10/29/2010 06:46 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Indeed the access to the data registers does not seem to be endian aware.
> 
> See in pch_can_rx_normal():
> 
> +			cf->can_dlc = get_can_dlc((ioread32(&priv->regs->
> +						   if1_mcont)) & 0xF);
> +			*(u16 *)(cf->data + 0) = ioread16(&priv->regs->
> +							  if1_dataa1);
> +			*(u16 *)(cf->data + 2) = ioread16(&priv->regs->
> +							  if1_dataa2);
> +			*(u16 *)(cf->data + 4) = ioread16(&priv->regs->
> +							  if1_datab1);
> +			*(u16 *)(cf->data + 6) = ioread16(&priv->regs->
> +							  if1_datab2);
> 
> See in pch_xmit():
> 
> +	/* Copy data to register */
> +	if (cf->can_dlc > 0) {
> +		u32 data1 = *((u16 *)&cf->data[0]);
> +		iowrite32(data1, &priv->regs->if2_dataa1);
> +	}
> +	if (cf->can_dlc > 2) {
> +		u32 data1 = *((u16 *)&cf->data[2]);
> +		iowrite32(data1, &priv->regs->if2_dataa2);
> +	}
> +	if (cf->can_dlc > 4) {
> +		u32 data1 = *((u16 *)&cf->data[4]);
> +		iowrite32(data1, &priv->regs->if2_datab1);
> +	}
> +	if (cf->can_dlc > 6) {
> +		u32 data1 = *((u16 *)&cf->data[6]);
> +		iowrite32(data1, &priv->regs->if2_datab2);
> +	}
> +
> 
> It's just a question if the driver for an Intel Chipset should/could ignore
> the endian problematic.
> 
> If this is intended the driver should only appear in Kconfig depending on X86
> or little endian systems.
> 
> Besides this remark, the struct pch_can_regs could also be defined in a way
> that every single CAN payload data byte could be accessed directly to allow

That _should_ work on x86. On the contrary on ARM some registers in SOCs
allow only full 32 bit access.

> e.g. this code in pch_can_rx_normal():
> 
> cf->data[0] = ioread8(&priv->regs->if1_data0);
> cf->data[1] = ioread8(&priv->regs->if1_data1);
> cf->data[2] = ioread8(&priv->regs->if1_data2);
> (..)
> cf->data[6] = ioread8(&priv->regs->if1_data6);
> cf->data[7] = ioread8(&priv->regs->if1_data7);

> This is easy to understand and additionally endian aware.

or use this, (as proposed in a earlier mail)

	for (i = 0; i < cf->can_dlc; i += 2) {
		reg = ioread32(&priv->regs->if1_data[i >> 1]);
		*(__be16 *)cf->data[i] = cpu_to_be16(reg);
	}

> In opposite to this:
> 
> +	if (cf->can_dlc > 2) {
> +		u32 data1 = *((u16 *)&cf->data[2]);
> +		iowrite32(data1, &priv->regs->if2_dataa2);
> +	}
> 
> Which puts a little? endian u16 into the big endian register layout.
> Sorry i'm just getting curious on this register access implementation.

According to the datasheet the layout is LE.

cheers, Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature