RE: [PATCH v2] POWER: Add gpio charger driver

[Rhyland Klein]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars-Peter Clausen [mailto:lars@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 10:48 AM
> To: Anton Vorontsov
> Cc: Rhyland Klein; broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andrew Chew;
> olof@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] POWER: Add gpio charger driver
> 
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:55:01PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> >> This patch adds a simple driver for chargers indicating their online
> status
> >> through a GPIO pin.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hm. I'm getting older, it seems. Now can anybody remind me why
> > pda_power.c doesn't work here? ;-)
> >
> > This driver looks like a light-weigh version of pda_power, except
> > that it can do GPIOs directly (instead of is_*_online() callbacks).
> >
> > Can we instead improve pda_power? Like this:
> >
> > 	if (!pdata->is_ac_online && pdata->ac_monitor_gpio)
> > 		pdata->is_ac_online = pda_ac_monitor_gpio;
> >
> > Should look quite cool, I think.
> >
> > (Plus, we might get rid of ac/usb stuff in that driver, and
> > pass enum power_supply_type to the callbacks instead).
> >
> 
> Hi
> 
> Hm... I guess it can be, but on the other hand most platform bus chargers
> type
> devices can be, because the pda_power driver is keep pretty generic with
> custom init,
> status and exit callbacks.
> 
> - Lars

I didn't see any more discussion on this. Is the plan to integrate the gpio-charger driver as is or to instead try to integrate support for this into pda_power?

-rhyland
N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶ÇvØ^–)Þ{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±‘êçzX§¶›¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚ&j:+v‰¨¾«‘êçzZ+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸?™¨è­Ú&¢)ßf”ù^jÇy§m…á@A«a¶Úÿ0¶ìh®å’i