Re: [PATCH] x86: OLPC: add OLPC device-tree support (v3)

[Grant Likely]

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:58:46PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> 
> Make use of PROC_DEVICETREE to export the tree, and sparc's PROMTREE code to
> call into OLPC's Open Firmware to build the tree.
> 
> v3: rename olpc_prom to olpc_dt
>   - rework Kconfig entries
>   - drop devtree build hook from proc, instead adding a call to x86's
>     paging_init (similarly to how sparc64 does it)
>   - switch allocation from using slab to alloc_bootmem.  this allows
>     the DT to be built earlier during boot (during setup_arch); the
>     downside is that there are some 1200 bootmem reservations that are
>     done during boot.  Not ideal..
>   - add a helper olpc_ofw_is_installed function to test for the
>     existence and successful detection of OLPC's OFW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>

Overall this patch looks fine, but it needs to be acked from the x86
maintainers, and I'd like it to have a cycle through linux-next before
it gets merged, so that means 2.6.38 because the 2.6.37 merge window
has already been open for almost a week.

The promtree patches have been merged though.

Comments below.

g.

> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                |    6 ++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_ofw.h |    9 ++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h     |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile        |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/olpc_dt.c       |  165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/olpc_ofw.c      |    5 +
>  arch/x86/mm/init_32.c           |    2 +
>  7 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/olpc_dt.c
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index cea0cd9..1d57e2b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -2069,11 +2069,17 @@ config OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE
>  	bool "Support for OLPC's Open Firmware"
>  	depends on !X86_64 && !X86_PAE
>  	default y if OLPC
> +	select OF
>  	help
>  	  This option adds support for the implementation of Open Firmware
>  	  that is used on the OLPC XO-1 Children's Machine.
>  	  If unsure, say N here.
>  
> +config OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE_DT
> +	bool
> +	default y if OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE && PROC_DEVICETREE
> +	select OF_PROMTREE
> +
>  endif # X86_32
>  
>  config K8_NB
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_ofw.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_ofw.h
> index 08fde47..a41250e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_ofw.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/olpc_ofw.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE
>  
> +extern bool olpc_ofw_is_installed(void);
> +
>  /* run an OFW command by calling into the firmware */
>  #define olpc_ofw(name, args, res) \
>  	__olpc_ofw((name), ARRAY_SIZE(args), args, ARRAY_SIZE(res), res)
> @@ -23,9 +25,16 @@ extern void setup_olpc_ofw_pgd(void);
>  
>  #else /* !CONFIG_OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE */
>  
> +static inline bool olpc_ofw_is_installed(void) { return false; }
>  static inline void olpc_ofw_detect(void) { }
>  static inline void setup_olpc_ofw_pgd(void) { }
>  
>  #endif /* !CONFIG_OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE_DT
> +extern void olpc_dt_build_devicetree(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void olpc_dt_build_devicetree(void) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE_DT */
> +
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_OLPC_OFW_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b4ec95f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/prom.h
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +/* dummy prom.h; here to make linux/of.h's #includes happy */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> index fedf32a..519539a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ scx200-y			+= scx200_32.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OLPC)		+= olpc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE)	+= olpc_ofw.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_OLPC_OPENFIRMWARE_DT)	+= olpc_dt.o

olpc_ofw_dt.o perhaps?

>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_MRST)		+= mrst.o
>  
>  microcode-y				:= microcode_core.o
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/olpc_dt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/olpc_dt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f660a11
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/olpc_dt.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
> +/*
> + * olpc_dt.c: OLPC-specific OFW device tree support code.

Nit: I personally prefer not to see the file name encoded in the
header block.

> + *
> + * Paul Mackerras	August 1996.
> + * Copyright (C) 1996-2005 Paul Mackerras.
> + *
> + *  Adapted for 64bit PowerPC by Dave Engebretsen and Peter Bergner.
> + *    {engebret|bergner}@us.ibm.com
> + *
> + *  Adapted for sparc by David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> + *  Adapted for x86/OLPC by Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + *      This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + *      modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + *      as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
> + *      2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_pdt.h>
> +#include <asm/olpc_ofw.h>
> +
> +static phandle __init olpc_dt_getsibling(phandle node)
> +{
> +	const void *args[] = { (void *)node };
> +	void *res[] = { &node };
> +
> +	if (node == -1)
> +		return 0;

phandle is a u32, so testing against a negative value is not sane.

> +
> +	if (olpc_ofw("peer", args, res) || node == -1)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return node;
> +}
> +
> +static phandle __init olpc_dt_getchild(phandle node)
> +{
> +	const void *args[] = { (void *)node };
> +	void *res[] = { &node };
> +
> +	if (node == -1)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (olpc_ofw("child", args, res) || node == -1) {
> +		pr_err("PROM: %s: fetching child failed!\n", __func__);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return node;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init olpc_dt_getproplen(phandle node, const char *prop)
> +{
> +	const void *args[] = { (void *)node, prop };
> +	int len;
> +	void *res[] = { &len };
> +
> +	if (node == -1)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	if (olpc_ofw("getproplen", args, res)) {
> +		pr_err("PROM: %s: getproplen failed!\n", __func__);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return len;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init olpc_dt_getproperty(phandle node, const char *prop,
> +		char *buf, int bufsize)
> +{
> +	int plen;
> +
> +	plen = olpc_dt_getproplen(node, prop);
> +	if (plen > bufsize || plen < 1)
> +		return -1;
> +	else {

Nit: If there are braces on the else clause, then please use them on
the if() clause also.

> +		const void *args[] = { (void *)node, prop, buf, (void *)plen };
> +		void *res[] = { &plen };
> +
> +		if (olpc_ofw("getprop", args, res)) {
> +			pr_err("PROM: %s: getprop failed!\n", __func__);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return plen;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init olpc_dt_nextprop(phandle node, char *prev, char *buf)
> +{
> +	const void *args[] = { (void *)node, prev, buf };

This looks wrong.  It does not look sane to cast node as a pointer
(which won't be the same size on x86_64), and then recast it to an int
inside __olpc_ofw().  Do you know why the api is implemented in this
way?

> +	int success;
> +	void *res[] = { &success };
> +
> +	buf[0] = '\0';
> +
> +	if (node == -1)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	if (olpc_ofw("nextprop", args, res) || success != 1)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init olpc_dt_pkg2path(phandle node, char *buf,
> +		const int buflen, int *len)
> +{
> +	const void *args[] = { (void *)node, buf, (void *)buflen };
> +	void *res[] = { len };
> +
> +	if (node == -1)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	if (olpc_ofw("package-to-path", args, res) || *len < 1)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int prom_early_allocated __initdata;
> +
> +void * __init prom_early_alloc(unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	void *res;
> +
> +	res = alloc_bootmem(size);
> +	if (res)
> +		memset(res, 0, size);
> +
> +	prom_early_allocated += size;
> +
> +	return res;
> +}
> +
> +static struct of_pdt_ops prom_olpc_ops __initdata = {
> +	.nextprop = olpc_dt_nextprop,
> +	.getproplen = olpc_dt_getproplen,
> +	.getproperty = olpc_dt_getproperty,
> +	.getchild = olpc_dt_getchild,
> +	.getsibling = olpc_dt_getsibling,
> +	.pkg2path = olpc_dt_pkg2path,
> +};
> +
> +void __init olpc_dt_build_devicetree(void)
> +{
> +	phandle root;
> +
> +	if (!olpc_ofw_is_installed())
> +		return;
> +
> +	root = olpc_dt_getsibling(0);
> +	if (root < 0) {
> +		pr_err("PROM: unable to get root node from OFW!\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	of_pdt_build_devicetree(root, &prom_olpc_ops);
> +
> +	pr_info("PROM DT: Built device tree with %u bytes of memory.\n",
> +			prom_early_allocated);
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/olpc_ofw.c b/arch/x86/kernel/olpc_ofw.c
> index 3218aa7..2176048 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/olpc_ofw.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/olpc_ofw.c
> @@ -104,3 +104,8 @@ void __init olpc_ofw_detect(void)
>  			(unsigned long)olpc_ofw_cif, (-start) >> 20);
>  	reserve_top_address(-start);
>  }
> +
> +bool __init olpc_ofw_is_installed(void)
> +{
> +	return olpc_ofw_cif != NULL;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> index bca7909..41bf85f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>  #include <asm/bugs.h>
>  #include <asm/tlb.h>
>  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> +#include <asm/olpc_ofw.h>
>  #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>  #include <asm/sections.h>
>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> @@ -833,6 +834,7 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
>  	/*
>  	 * NOTE: at this point the bootmem allocator is fully available.
>  	 */
> +	olpc_dt_build_devicetree();
>  	sparse_init();
>  	zone_sizes_init();
>  }
> -- 
> 1.5.6.5
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/