Re: netns patches WAS( Re: [PATCH 8/8] net: Implement socketat.

[Eric W. Biederman]

jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Eric,
>
> Ping?
> If you are too busy to push these in maybe have
> someone clueful like Daniel help out submitting? I think it
> should probably be reasonable to leave out the sockeat
> patch initially if it is deemed controversial..

This merge cycle I am too busy, and my patches did not make it into
linux-next before the merge window.

Everything except socketat at seems non-controversial.  socketat makes
sense to post-pone a little bit until we start converting applications,
and there is a little real world experience about what is needed.

I anticipate some time freeing up in the next couple of weeks so I
should be ready for the next merge window.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/