Re: [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Probably the best fix is to go back to allocating the stacks with
> get_free_pages(), and only keep the pointers in percpu memory.

Yes, please do. The "irq stack in percpu area" upsides are almost zero
afaik, and the complexity required for it has been ridiculous.

                                 Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/