Re: [PATCH 5/6] Export ns irqtimes through /proc/stat -v1

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 15:30 -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> +static void irqtime_account_process_tick(struct task_struct *p, int user_tick,
> +                                               struct rq *rq)
> +{
> +       cputime_t one_jiffy_scaled = cputime_to_scaled(cputime_one_jiffy);
> +       cputime64_t tmp = cputime_to_cputime64(cputime_one_jiffy);
> +       struct cpu_usage_stat *cpustat = &kstat_this_cpu.cpustat;
> +
> +       if (irqtime_account_hi_update()) {
> +               cpustat->irq = cputime64_add(cpustat->irq, tmp);
> +       } else if (irqtime_account_si_update()) {
> +               cpustat->softirq = cputime64_add(cpustat->softirq, tmp);
> +       } else 

I'm still not sure about this else stmt, the above two conditions can
basically 'eat' user/system ticks. What we need to show is that there is
no bias towards either kind so the ratio is not affected -- can we make
such an argument?

>                if (user_tick) {
> +               account_user_time(p, cputime_one_jiffy, one_jiffy_scaled);
> +       } else if (p == rq->idle) {
> +               account_idle_time(cputime_one_jiffy);
> +       } else if (p->flags & PF_VCPU) { /* System time or guest time */
> +               account_guest_time(p, cputime_one_jiffy, one_jiffy_scaled);
> +       } else {
> +               __account_system_time(p, cputime_one_jiffy, one_jiffy_scaled,
> +                                       &cpustat->system);
> +       }
> +} 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/