Re: [PATCH 16/29] memstick: jmb38x_ms: s/jmb38x_ms/j38ms/g

[Maxim Levitsky]

On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 08:58 -0700, Alex Dubov wrote:
> 
> --- On Fri, 22/10/10, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH 16/29] memstick: jmb38x_ms: s/jmb38x_ms/j38ms/g
> > To: "Alex Dubov" <oakad@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "LKML" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Maxim Levitsky" <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Received: Friday, 22 October, 2010, 4:53 PM
> > This just makes it easier to type
> > function names
> > while still keeping the meaning
> > Driver name and filenames are left unchanged.
> > 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> What sort of patch/argument is this?
> Function prefix should match the module name, to be immediately and
> unambiguously identifiable in the stack trace.
In that case maybe rename the module too?
'jmb38x_ms' is just a mouthful as Andrew Morton would say.

I mean if you really really dislike that, I could revert it, but for
peoples sake, whats wrong with that?

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/