Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/9p: Return error on read with NULL buffer

From: Aneesh Kumar K. V
Date: Sun Oct 24 2010 - 10:32:46 EST


On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:59:57 -0700, Brad Boyer <flar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 08:10:53PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > This patch ensures that a read(fd, NULL, 0 ) returns EFAULT on a 9p file.
>
> Is there some specific reason you want this behavior? I believe the
> generic Linux code returns success in this case. I tried this exact
> system call with fd being a pty or a file on ext3 and got 0 for both.

Linux code return 0 in case count == 0;
This is what i find on ext4.

open("a.c", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, 0, 10) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address)

open("a.c", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, NULL, 0) = 0

This patch ensure that we get the behaviour as in case one in case of 9p
file system. But patch broke the behaviour in step 2. So below is the
updated one

commit bd1717e5300ab0bb9aa2df139ffbc5e49f1baeb6
Author: Sanchit Garg <sancgarg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Oct 19 09:17:02 2010 +0530

net/9p: Return error on read with NULL buffer

This patch ensures that a read(fd, NULL, 10) returns EFAULT on a 9p file.

Signed-off-by: Sanchit Garg <sancgarg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
index e141e46..dbca5b3 100644
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -1333,16 +1333,13 @@ p9_client_read(struct p9_fid *fid, char *data, char __user *udata, u64 offset,

if (data) {
memmove(data, dataptr, count);
- }
-
- if (udata) {
+ } else {
err = copy_to_user(udata, dataptr, count);
if (err) {
err = -EFAULT;
goto free_and_error;
}
}
-
p9_free_req(clnt, req);
return count;



-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/