Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree

[Yinghai Lu]

On 10/21/2010 08:36 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
> 
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:03:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got a conflict in
>> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c between commit
>> 1d931264af0f10649b35afa8fbd2e169da51ac08 ("x86-32, memblock: Make
>> add_highpages honor early reserved ranges") from the tip tree and commit
>> 07147a06ac3b1b028124ea00ba44e69eb8ea7685 ("x86/32: honor reservations of
>> high memory") from the xen tree.
>>
>> I have no idea how to fix this up, sorry, so I have used the xen tree
>> from next-20101021 for today.
> 

x86-32, memblock: Make add_highpages honor early reserved ranges

is updated version with memblock for

x86/32: honor reservations of high memory

Assume Jeremy would update the xen tree.

Thanks

	Yinghai

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/