Re: [PATCH 17/21] fs: protect wake_up_inode with inode->i_lock

[Nick Piggin]

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:17:22PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks good, and thanks for documenting unlock_new_inode.

You wanted an example of how the irregular locking requires
handling of new concurrency situations? This is another good
one.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/