Re: [PATCH 0/6] Results of my work on memorystick subsystem

[Maxim Levitsky]

On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 02:40 -0700, Alex Dubov wrote:
> --- On Mon, 18/10/10, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > But for mspro driver, it would be really hard for me to
> > split it.
> > I have rewritten a lot of code there.
> > Can't we just review the end result instead of the patch?
> > 
> > To split the patches, I pretty much need to rewrite the
> > whole thing once
> > gain.
> > I don't want to do that.
> > 
> 
> First, a useful citation (Documentation/HOWTO:548):
> "The Linux kernel community does not gladly accept large chunks of code
> dropped on it all at once.  The changes need to be properly introduced,
> discussed, and broken up into tiny, individual portions."
> 
> I actually attempted to submit a large "full rewrite" patch early on
> during development of one of my drivers. I was a sole developer and it was
> not even on a stable tree, as far as I can remember. Yet, that patch was
> dropped immediately with the above given reason.
> 
> And yes, I had to rewrite the whole thing again, this time in small steps.
Understood...

Fortunately, yesterday I have finished splitting all but jmicron patch,
and I finish it today, test patches for working (final state does work,
I tested), and resumbit.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/