[patch 25/35] fs: icache reduce some locking overheads

From: npiggin
Date: Mon Oct 18 2010 - 23:59:39 EST


Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>

---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 8 +++++---
fs/inode.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-10-19 14:18:59.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-10-19 14:19:21.000000000 +1100
@@ -375,15 +375,17 @@
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
dirty = inode->i_state & I_DIRTY;
inode->i_state &= ~(I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC);
- spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
/* Don't write the inode if only I_DIRTY_PAGES was set */
if (dirty & (I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC)) {
- int err = write_inode(inode, wbc);
+ int err;
+
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ err = write_inode(inode, wbc);
if (ret == 0)
ret = err;
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
}

- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
spin_lock(&wb_inode_list_lock);
inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC;
if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
Index: linux-2.6/fs/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/inode.c 2010-10-19 14:18:59.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/inode.c 2010-10-19 14:19:22.000000000 +1100
@@ -857,9 +857,12 @@

inode = alloc_inode(sb);
if (inode) {
- spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
inode->i_ino = get_next_ino();
inode->i_state = 0;
+ /*
+ * We could init inode locked here, to improve performance.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
__inode_add_to_lists(sb, NULL, inode);
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/