Re: [PATCH 4/9] jump label: Fix deadlock b/w jump_label_mutex vs.text_mutex

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Fri Oct 15 2010 - 22:16:16 EST


On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 22:55 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > +void jump_label_lock(void)
> > +{
> > + mutex_lock(&jump_label_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
>
> > +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > @@ -1145,13 +1145,16 @@ int __kprobes register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > return ret;
> >
> > preempt_disable();
> > + jump_label_lock();
>
> How exactly does that work?

Ouch! Good catch!

I'll do the James Bottomley and blame jet lag ;-)

-- Steve

>
> > if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
> > in_kprobes_functions((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
> > ftrace_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) ||
> > jump_label_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr)) {
> > preempt_enable();
> > + jump_label_unlock();
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > + jump_label_unlock();


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/