Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [tip:irq/core] x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling

[H. Peter Anvin]

It should.

"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 10/15/2010 05:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>  On 10/12/2010 01:29 PM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> Commit-ID:  77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb
>>> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/77dff1c755c3218691e95e7e38ee14323b35dbdb
>>> Author:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> AuthorDate: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:37:10 +0200
>>> Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CommitDate: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:53:44 +0200
>>>
>>> x86: xen: Sanitise sparse_irq handling
>>>
>>> There seems to be more cleanups possible, but that's left to the xen
>>> experts :)
>> This causes the kernel to fail to boot under Xen.  The WARN_ON(res !=
>> irq) triggers and nobody is very happy about the results.
>
>Of course the really interesting question is whether this sparse irq
>rework allows us to hang our extra per-irq information of the irq_data
>structure now, rather than having to maintain all these auxiliary arrays?
>
>Thanks,
>    J

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon any lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/