Re: [PATCH 3/4] sched: drop group_capacity to 1 only if localgroup has extra capacity

[Suresh Siddha]

On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 10:05 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> For regular balancing local_group will be the first, since we only
> ascend the domain tree on the local groups. But its not true for no_hz
> balancing afaikt.

Even for NOHZ, we always ascend each cpu's sched domain and the local
group is the first one always. But yes, we are depending on the local
group being the first group.

thanks,
suresh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/