RE: [PATCHv3 00/11] staging tidspbridge: iommu migration

From: Guzman Lugo, Fernando
Date: Fri Oct 15 2010 - 12:53:33 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 11:28 AM
> To: Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx;
> ameya.palande@xxxxxxxxx; Menon, Nishanth;
> Hiroshi.DOYU@xxxxxxxxx; ohad@xxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx;
> linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/11] staging tidspbridge: iommu migration
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> <fernando.lugo@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Well, in my experience it's the other way around, the stress
> >> test-cases don't catch the errors that happen on real use-case
> >> scenarios, no matter how extensive they are. This is a
> good example.
> >
> > I am facing some unstability with the latest bridge merge.
> I am looing
> > into That once it is stable I wil check you testcase too to confirm
> > everything is Working fine.
>
> If you want I can provide my working branch on top of .36-rc8
> with next-staging merged. If I revert your patches, it works fine.

That could be interested. Can you send me the link?

Regards,
Fernando.

>
> --
> Felipe Contreras
> --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/