Re: [PATCH 03/22] s390: introduce little endian bitops

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 15 October 2010, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> +#define __set_le_bit(nr, addr) \
> +       __set_bit((nr)^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE - 8), (addr))
> +#define __clear_le_bit(nr, addr)       \
> +       __clear_bit((nr)^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE - 8), (addr))
> +#define __test_and_set_le_bit(nr, addr)        \
> +       __test_and_set_bit((nr)^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE - 8), (addr))
> +#define test_and_set_le_bit(lock, nr, addr)    \
> +       test_and_set_bit((nr)^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE - 8), (addr))
> +#define __test_and_clear_le_bit(nr, addr)      \
> +       __test_and_clear_bit((nr)^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE - 8), (addr))
> +#define test_and_clear_le_bit(lock, nr, addr)  \
> +       test_and_clear_bit((nr)^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE - 8), (addr))
> +#define test_le_bit(nr, addr)  \
> +       test_bit((nr)^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE - 8), (addr))

The test_and_clear_le_bit and test_and_set_le_bit calling conventions
are a little surprising here. I would not pass the lock argument
here but leave that to the ext2 wrapper:

#define test_and_set_le_bit(nr, addr)    \
       test_and_set_bit((nr)^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE - 8), (addr))
#define test_and_clear_le_bit(nr, addr)  \
       test_and_clear_bit((nr)^(__BITOPS_WORDSIZE - 8), (addr))

#define ext2_set_bit_atomic(lock, nr, addr)       \
       test_and_set_le_bit((nr), (unsigned long *)(addr))
#define ext2_clear_bit_atomic(lock, nr, addr)     \
       test_and_clear_le_bit((nr), (unsigned long *)(addr))

Same thing on arm and m68k.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/